A Three-Way Debate

Teena Myers, SCW President

Christianity teaches its adherents to love one another. Within the church, I’ve found a roller coaster of love and quarreling, but so did Jesus. I continue to persevere, and sometimes wonder if Jesus’ “love one another” command is an ideal we will never attain.

From the beginning of the church those who teach fan the flames of disagreement. Teachers in the early church wrestled with the place of law in a believer’s life. Some Jewish Christians demanded Gentiles to obey the law given to Moses as a condition of salvation. Others pointed to Israel’s failure to obey the law as proof no one can be saved by obeying God’s law. Both sides had convincing arguments. After years of quarreling, Christianity embraced saved by faith.

A point of contention among contemporary Bible teachers is eternal security. Some claim the Christian can never lose his or her salvation. Others disagree. Both contenders in this boxing ring have powerful and convincing arguments as well.

Those who embrace eternal security point to God’s nature as a loving father. Regardless of how badly a child behaves, he or she never stops being a son or daughter. The child may need discipline but never loses his or her place in the family. This argument is very appealing. I cannot fathom kicking one of my sons out of my family. On the other hand, my sons seldom fought with each other and were a joy to raise. Would I have a different attitude if they had been rebellious and disobedient causing great pain?

The eternal security adherents claim a person who abandons Christ was never genuinely “saved” in the first place. They point to Paul’s argument in Romans Chapter 8 that no power in heaven or on earth can separate us from the love of God. Jesus claim that no one can snatch us out of his hand appears to seal their position as true. In my own experience, I have found it impossible to abandon Christianity, and I have tried to on several occasions. (Matthew 7:21-23; Romans 8:38-39; John 10:28)

Those who claim salvation can be lost also have a convincing argument. They believe eternal security is a dangerous doctrine because it gives people license to sin. They agree that God is a loving father, but add that he is also a God of justice. We cannot sin and retain our salvation they argue. Without holiness no one will see God. Therefore, we must overcome our sin to be saved.

Conditional security is not as pleasant as eternally secure. My sister accepted Christ and attended church sporadically but she never overcame her drug addiction and died a tragic death at a young age. I want to believe her efforts to obey God, especially at the end of her life, gained her entrance to heaven. The thought that she is doomed to eternal torment in hell is too terrible for my mind to comprehend.

The conditional salvation adherents also have scriptures. The law God gave to Moses had provision for stoning a son who was a drunkard and glutton. Hebrews Chapter 6 addresses the impossibility of those who fall away finding repentance again. Jesus spoke about weeping and gnashing of teeth when some are cast out of “the kingdom.” If they were never saved how did they get into the kingdom?  The strongest argument comes from Revelation chapter 3, which promises Jesus will never blot our name out of the book of life if we overcome. The implication is clear. Those who fail to overcome their sin will have their name blotted from the book of life. (Deuteronomy 21:20-21; Hebrews 6:4-6; Luke 13:28; Revelation 3:5)

I believe both sides of the argument are correct when placed in the context of time. God has a way of calling things that are not as though they are. For example, on the last and greatest day of the Feast of Tabernacles, Jesus challenged the thirsty to come to him and drink. The author inserted a note of explanation regarding Jesus invitation: “By this he meant the Spirit, whom those who believed in him were later to receive.” Based on the author’s explanation, if anyone came to Jesus immediately after he made that invitation, he or she would have remained thirsty until forty days after Jesus’ resurrection. (Romans 4:17; John 7:37-39)

Our salvation is also something we possess now but receive later. Christians possess the hope of salvation, which is the redemption of our body from death. Paul wrote to the Romans, “For in this hope we were saved. But hope that is seen is no hope at all. Who hopes for what he already has?” If I already possessed salvation I would not die. Yet all of us will die one day. Therefore, to those who say we can lose our salvation, I would say, “We cannot lose what we do not yet possess. We can lose what we only have a down payment on.” (Romans 8:24-25)

The Holy Spirit, who arrived forty days after Jesus resurrection, is the guarantee that God will keep his promise to save us by giving us eternal life. Our Spirits don’t need eternal life because they continue to exist after the body dies. If our name is in the Book of Life our spirit will return to God. The spirits of disobedient people who never made peace with God will go to a dark place until judgment day.

One day, everyone, those hanging out with God in heaven and those wandering in a dark place, will be resurrected from the dead, another way of saying body and spirit with be reunited. Then everyone will be judged for the things they did while they inhabited a body on the earth. Christians rely on Jesus’ intercession to save us from the second death when we are judged. (Daniel 12:2-3; Revelation 20:4-6, 12-15)

Therefore, I agree with those who say we are eternally secure. After Jesus intercedes to save us from the second death we are eternally saved from death. As long as we only hold a down payment on salvation, we are not secure. Unless we are obeying his command to love one another as he has loved us.

 

Responses

  1. The Eclectic Contrarian Avatar

    Salvation is our choice. Not God’s. We make the daily decision to take up our crosses and follow Him. We are free moral agents.

  2. Ze Selassie Avatar


    This was a deeply thoughtful reflection, and I appreciate the balance you’ve struck between doctrinal rigor and personal honesty. As a prison chaplain and counselor, I’ve walked with souls who’ve tasted grace but wrestled with relapse, rebellion, and regret. The tension between eternal security and conditional perseverance isn’t just theological, it’s pastoral.

    The Scriptures affirm both God’s steadfast covenant and our call to endure. Philippians 1:6 reminds us that ‘He who began a good work in you will carry it on to completion,’ yet Hebrews 10:26 warns against willful sin after receiving the knowledge of the truth.

    In my work and in my own journey, I’ve come to see salvation not as a static moment but a living relationship, a walk that must be nurtured. I echo your insight: the Spirit is our guarantee, not our conclusion. We have a deposit, not the full inheritance. That day is still to come.

    So, do I believe we are secure in Christ? Yes, but only as we remain in Him (John 15:4-6). May we teach, not only grace, but the grace that teaches us to say no to ungodliness (Titus 2:11-12).

    Thank you for stirring this much-needed dialogue with both courage and compassion.

    1. Teena Myers Avatar

      Thank you for a thoughtful reply. It’s always great hearing from readers, especially when they agree. I pray God bless your ministry abundantly.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from scwguild.com

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading